State v. Hemm
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dams District Court.---Hoe. Charles D. Leggett, Judge. Irdiotmert for seduction. “Verdict of guilty, and a judgment thereon, from which the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
I. The indictment charges that the defendant “did * * * seduce, debauch and carnally ,1- seduction”1' of the word know one Mary E. Starner, the said Mary E. Starner being then and there an unmarried female o± previous chaste character,” etc. The language of the statute is: “If any person seduce and debauch-an unmarried woman,” etc. It is urged that the indictment is defective because the ofíense is charged as committed against a “female” and not a “ woman.”
It is true that, comprehensively considered, the term “female” is generic, and includes a variety of species, while the word “woman” has a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ande v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- State v. PrizerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gale H. Johnson v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- State v. McIntireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.