Legal Opinion

State v. Hemm

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 23, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Dams District Court.---Hoe. Charles D. Leggett, Judge. Irdiotmert for seduction. “Verdict of guilty, and a judgment thereon, from which the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

I. The indictment charges that the defendant “did * * * seduce, debauch and carnally ,1- seduction”1' of the word know one Mary E. Starner, the said Mary E. Starner being then and there an unmarried female o± previous chaste character,” etc. The language of the statute is: “If any person seduce and debauch-an unmarried woman,” etc. It is urged that the indictment is defective because the ofíense is charged as committed against a “female” and not a “ woman.”

It is true that, comprehensively considered, the term “female” is generic, and includes a variety of species, while the word “woman” has a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ande v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. State v. PrizerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gale H. Johnson v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. State v. McIntireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API