Legal Opinion
United States v. Lombardo
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 13, 2007No. 2:07-cr-00286PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
TED STEWART, District Judge.
On May 9, 2007, a grand jury returned a thirty-four count Indictment charging Defendants with conspiring in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), committing bank fraud, transmitting wagering information in violation of the Wire Act, 1 and laundering money. Currently before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss 2 the Indictment, each styled as follows: (1) Motion to Dismiss Wire Act Counts (Counts 16-19) 3 (the “Wire Act Motion”); (2) Motion to Dismiss…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reconsidering Whether the Wire Act Applies to Non-Sports Gambling, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2018
- Whether Proposals by Illinois and New York to Use the Internet and Out-of-State Transaction Processors to Sell Lottery Tickets to In-State Adults Violate the Wire Act, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2011
- Whether the Wire Act Applies to Non-Sports Gambling, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2011