Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Lovell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1984No. 83-21PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue on appeal here is whether a complaint which is filed on the day the statute of limitations would run, but which contains the notation "NO SERVICE TO BE MADE AT THIS TIME," is sufficient to commence a civil action, if it is not in fact served that day.

Marcia Finkelstein, plaintiff/appellant, was injured in an automobile accident which occurred on May 12, 1981, in Homewood, Alabama. The other automobile involved in the accident was driven by Sharon R. Lovell, but the automobile was owned by her husband, James G. Lovell. Appellant filed a complaint, for injuries she allegedly sustained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fountain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Houston v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Ward v. Saben Appliance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Freer v. PotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  2. De-Gas, Inc. v. Midland ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. MacE v. Centel Business SystemsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Maxwell v. Spring Hill CollegeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Reynolds v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API