Legal Opinion

State v. Mears

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 1972No. 71-596PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellee-petitioner moved, under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A. to vacate a judgment and sentence earlier entered. The state seeks review of an order granting the motion and awarding a new trial; the order was entered after an evidentiary hearing.

The underlying conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal, Kish v. State, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 315, and a denial of motion under Rule 1.850 CrPR (now renumbered 3.850) was affirmed in Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749, which indicates appellee has sought other relief.

The instant (second) petition for relief alleged that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cash v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Kish v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Mears v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Barber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ashley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Matrascia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API