Legal Opinion

Mudd v. Bast

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1864PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDryden, Judge

This was an action by John J. Mudd, Alexis Mudd, and Graham L. Hughes, to recover the price of certain personal property, which it was alleged they had sold and delivered to the appellants. It was charged in the petition that the plaintiffs “ in the year 1857 were co-partners doing business *466under the name and style of Mudd & Hughes;” and that while plaintiffs were so co-partners as aforesaid, to-wit, on or about the 10th day of September, 1867, plaintiffs bargained, sold and delivered to the defendants “ the property described.” The answer denied “ that the firm of Mudd & Hughes, at the time…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bender v. MarkleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. 8182 Maryland Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Hargadine v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Ober v. Indianapolis & St. Louis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Hargadine v. GibbonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API