Siotka v. Rappaport
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomsor
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover the purchase price of a fur coat, sold and delivered to the defendant, which was $285. The defendant filed an affidavit of merits setting forth “that he returned the * *' * coat, and holds plaintiffs’ receipt therefor; that it was agreed by the plaintiff, through its duly authorized agent that the * * * coat should be returned, and defendant given credit for $285.” This issue was submitted to the trial court without a jury, resulting in a finding for the defendant and judgment accordingly, to reverse which the plaintiffs have perfected this appeal.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McClunn v. GillespieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923