Legal Opinion

Siotka v. Rappaport

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1924No. Gen. No. 28,789Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomsor

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover the purchase price of a fur coat, sold and delivered to the defendant, which was $285. The defendant filed an affidavit of merits setting forth “that he returned the * *' * coat, and holds plaintiffs’ receipt therefor; that it was agreed by the plaintiff, through its duly authorized agent that the * * * coat should be returned, and defendant given credit for $285.” This issue was submitted to the trial court without a jury, resulting in a finding for the defendant and judgment accordingly, to reverse which the plaintiffs have perfected this appeal.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McClunn v. GillespieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API