Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against McCormick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 2013No. A11-1052PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*494ORDER

On August 22, 2012, we suspended respondent David Lawrence McCormick from the practice of law for a minimum of 60 days. In re McCormick, 819 N.W.2d 442, 445 (Minn.2012). Our opinion expressly stated that, within one year of the date of the filing of the order, respondent was required to file with the Clerk of Appellate Courts proof of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination and that failure to do so would result in automatic re-suspension, pursuant to Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). McCormick,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against McCormickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against McCormickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re NwaneriSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. In re KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API