Organized Village of Kake v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge, with whom THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge, joins,
concurring:
As the court’s opinion recognizes, the Tongass is vitally important to Southeast Alaska. The court is equally express in acknowledging that changes .of administration can indeed have consequences. Neither of these points is in dispute.
This case is unique because no new facts were presented between the'time the Department of Agriculture adopted the Road-less Rule in 2001 and the time it reversed its decision in 2003. The outcome of the case pivots on the undeniable: the 2003 *971decision was contradicted by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Friends of the Wild Swan v. Chip WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. ConnaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- John Jones, III v. National Marine Fisheries ServCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Sierra Club v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.