Legal Opinion

S. Euclid v. Njoku

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2022No. 111363PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as S. Euclid v. Njoku,

2022-Ohio-4388.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 111363 v. : INNOCENT NJOKU, JR., : Defendant-Appellee. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: December 8, 2022 Criminal Appeal from the South Euclid Municipal Court Case No. CRB 2000621 Appearances: Michael Lograsso, South Euclid Law Director, and Brian M. Fallon, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Russell S. Bensing, David L. Grant, and James M. Kersey, for appellee.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. City of Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BickerstaffOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ParrishOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. CountsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API