Legal Opinion

Driskill v. Culliver

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 27, 2001No. 2000325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Carrol Joe Driskill, an inmate in a state penitentiary, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his Rule 27, Ala.R.Civ.P., petition for preaction discovery. Driskill filed his motion to secure discovery concerning a possible civil-rights claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although Driskill's petition was captioned as a Rule 27 petition, Grant Culliver, the warden at Holman Prison, filed a Rule 12(b)(6), Ala.R.Civ.P., motion to dismiss. In that motion, Culliver described Driskill's pleading as an actual § 1983 complaint. The trial court granted Culliver's motion to dismiss.

Driskill argues that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Armstrong v. Brown Service Funeral Home West ChapelCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Public Relations Counsel, Inc. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D.R. Horton, Inc.—Birmingham v. FerrariSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API