Legal Opinion

Schumm v. Schumm

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 10, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

122 N.J. Super. 146 (1973)

299 A.2d 423

MARIE SCHUMM, PLAINTIFF,

v.

RICHARD MICHAEL SCHUMM, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 10, 1973.

Mr. Bernard J. Berry, Jr., for defendant (Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, attorneys).

Mr. Michael D. Mark, for plaintiff (Messrs. Skoloff and Wolfe, attorneys).

HARTMAN, J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.

Defendant moves to have vacated from a 1963 divorce decree of this court a provision therein for support of his oldest son who has arrived at age 18, contending that recent legislation makes every person 18 or more years of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Khalaf v. KhalafSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Straver v. StraverNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Cafaro v. CafaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Limpert v. LimpertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Newburgh v. ArrigoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Sakovits v. SakovitsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  4. Berger v. HollanderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Ross v. RossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API