Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Farm Lloyds, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided April 5, 2023No. 4:21-cv-00837Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION § GARY SMITH and MARTHA SMITH, § § Plaintiffs, § § Civil Action No. 4:21-CV-837 v. § Judge Mazzant § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. #81) and Plaintiffs’ Third Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. #93). Having considered the motion, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. #81) will be DENIED and Plaintiffs’ Third Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. #93) will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Elizabeth McDonough v. The Catholic University of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Texas A&M Research Foundation v. Magna Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. Export Worldwide, Ltd. v. KnightDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API