Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Oquendo v. Mid Mem Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 1984Published

1Concurrence

Fein, J. (concurring).

I concur in result solely upon the ground that there is no proof of actual or constructive notice of the defect or dangerous condition which brought about the accident. It is undisputed that the workman involved was an employee of K & M Corporation, apparently in possession of the property pursuant to a contract of sale. I am unpersuaded that the owner of a multiple dwelling can escape the liability imposed by section 78 of the Multiple Dwelling Law merely by entering into a contract of sale and putting the vendee in possession, without transferring title. Torres v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pharm v. LituchyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Torres v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API