State v. Rudy B.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
{1} New Mexico law requires a trial judge to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether a juvenile, adjudicated as a youthful offender for having committed certain serious criminal offenses, is “amenable” to treatment or rehabilitation in juvenile facilities or should be sentenced to prison as an adult. See NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-20 (1993) (amended 2009). Our courts have labored for years debating whether the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial requires the amenability determination to be made by the jury or by the trial judge as the statute provides. See State v.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In re M.I.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. RiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.