Legal Opinion

State v. Rudy B.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2010No. 31,909PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

{1} New Mexico law requires a trial judge to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether a juvenile, adjudicated as a youthful offender for having committed certain serious criminal offenses, is “amenable” to treatment or rehabilitation in juvenile facilities or should be sentenced to prison as an adult. See NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-20 (1993) (amended 2009). Our courts have labored for years debating whether the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial requires the amenability determination to be made by the jury or by the trial judge as the statute provides. See State v.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In re M.I.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. RiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API