Legal Opinion

Prizm Asset Management Co. v. Moosic Borough Planning Commission

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided February 3, 2006No. 2005 CIV 3513Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAZZONI, J,

I. INTRODUCTION

What is before this court is a petition for “Permission to appeal nunc pro tunc” filed on September 1, 2005 by petitioners Prizm Asset Management Company, Preit Services Ltd. and Diann Van Louvender. This petition seeks review of respondent Moosic Borough Planning Commission’s conditional approval of a land use application submitted by Hemingway Development Limited *331Partnership.1 The application submitted to the Planning Commission sought approval for the development of a retail store complex referred to as “The Shoppes at Montage.”

Hemingway and Dickinson Development…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Application of El Rancho Grande, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Cranberry Park Associates v. Cranberry Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Cablevision—Division of Sammons Communications, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Dixon EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API