Legal Opinion · Dissent
Keahbone v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 21, 1957No. A-12514Published
1DissentNix, Judge
It is conceded that in this case the bailiff communicated with the jury during their deliberation in violation of the Oklahoma Statutes, Title 22, § 857:
“After hearing the charge, the jury may either decide in court, or may retire for deliberation. If they do not agree without retiring, one or more officers must be sworn to keep them together in some private and convenient place, and not to permit any person to speak to or communicate with them, nor do so themselves, unless it be by order of the court, or to ask them whether they have agreed upon a verdict, and to return them into court when…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WrothWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- People v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.