Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1934No. A-8529Published

1DissentDavenport, J.

After having carefully read and studied the record in this case, I cannot give my approval and concur in the opinion of the majority of the court, for the reason that I do not believe the evidence and the law are sufficient to sustain the conviction as here presented.

The following is a brief abstract of the testimony as presented to the court and jury: The deceased, Pat Urkheart, lived in the neighborhood where the defendant Jim Norton, his wife, and son were living; Urkheart claimed to have gotten control of the house in which the Nortons were living; George Norton, at the time of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Carrico v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Lebo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Mayberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API