Legal Opinion

George Sollitt Corp. v. Howard Chapman Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 22, 1992No. 14451-4-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, C.J.

The George Sollitt Corporation (Sollitt) appeals from a declaratory judgment in favor of Howard Chapman Plumbing & Heating, Inc. (Chapman), contending that its work subcontract required Chapman to indemnify and defend it in a negligence action brought by one of Chapman's employees. We agree that Chapman has a duty to defend and reverse.

Sollitt entered into a subcontract with Chapman as part of its contract with the State to construct residential units and do site development at the Child Study and Treatment Center at Western State Hospital near Tacoma. Randall Lee Porcher suffered injuries…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mason v. BittonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Stute v. P.B.M.C., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gilbert H. Moen Co. v. Island Steel Erectors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Knipschield v. C-J Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. Parkridge Associates, Ltd v. Ledcor Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Parkridge Associates, Ltd. v. Ledcor Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Tateosian v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API