In re the Estate of Holmes
Essex County Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hartshorne, C. P. J.
In the above insolvent estate, the question must be determined, in view of the shortage of assets, as to the relative priorities among the claims, all of which are preferred, of the United States government, for income taxes, of the undertaker, for funeral expenses, of the widow, for incidental funeral expenses, such as the burial plot and monument, and of the executor and its counsel, for commissions and allowances. All concede that the funeral expenses, incurred by both the undertaker and the widow, were reasonable and in conformity with the decedent’s station in life,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brunner v. MorrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Young v. ConoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Fitz Randolph v. Fitz RandolphNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. DennettUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re PryorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004