Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 27, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from possessing weapons. According to the misbehavior report, a correction officer observed petitioner holding a weapon. Petitioner was ordered to surrender the weapon and a sharpened metal rod was then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MTR. OF ABDUR-RAHEEM v. MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Farid v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Bolling v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Harris v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Emmons v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
  2. Davis v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Chujoi v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Crawford v. GirdichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Vidal v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API