Legal Opinion

Gundersonv. Illinois T. & S. Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Foreclosure of a Trust Deed.—Intervening petition. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seabs

The only question presented for determination is as to the sufficiency of the petition by which plaintiffs in error sought to intervene and to interpose a defense to the foreclosure suit. We will consider the various grounds upon -which it is urged that the plaintiffs in error were entitled to be heard.

The contention that plaintiffs in error, as stockholders of the corporation Avhich owned the .equity in the mortgaged premises, were necessary parties defendant to a suit to foreclose, is not tenable. The corporation represents the stockholders in bringing and defending suits to which the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Harwood v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Bronson v. La Crosse & Milwaukie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Ward v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex parte GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Gray v. South & North Alabama Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Amgro, Inc. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Schaeffer v. PotzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API