Legal Opinion

Bregman-Rodoski v. Rozas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 2005No. A05A0178PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Beverly Bregman-Rodoski sued Dr. Kevin Rozas for medical malpractice, alleging that Rozas negligently performed a hysterectomy and bladder-neck suspension surgery. Rozas moved for summary judgment on the grounds that Bregman-Rodoski failed to comply with the expert affidavit requirement. The trial court granted the motion, and this appeal ensued. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the movant must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the evidence of record, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goring v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Cherokee County Hospital Authority v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Estate of Patterson v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Hayes v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Crawford v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. Wellstar Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Whitley v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Roberts v. NessimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Rudd v. PadenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Padgett v. Baxley & Appling County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API