Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1996No. DM-374Published

1Opinion of the Court

QiXfice of the 5!lttornep @enera Mate of Qexae DAN MORALES Al-ronNLY GENERAL Jmuaiy25,19% Mr. Ray Far&es Opiion No. DM,374 of&e OfGeneral ColuLwl The University of Texas System Re: Whether the El Paso County Water 201 west seventh street Jmprovement District No. 1 may, pursuant Austin, Texas 787013981 to chapter 55, subchapter N of the Water code,assessrtaxonthe~tbasis against land belonging to the Permanent University Fund (IQ-71 5) Dear Mr. Farabee~ You have requested our opinion as to whether land belong@ to the permanent University Fund’is subject to taxation on a be&t basis under chapter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clegg v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Conlen Grain & Mercantile, Inc. v. Texas Grain Sorghum Producers BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Maverick County Water Control & Improvement District 1 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. State v. University of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API