Legal Opinion

Pacific Sec. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. Docket No. 3806-89Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PACIFIC SECURITIES, JOHN WERTIN, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Pacific Sec. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 3806-89

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-90; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 95; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 2060; T.C.M. (RIA) 92090;

February 12, 1992, Filed

Decision will be entered for respondent.

Louis A. Huskins, for petitioner.

Mary Tseng and Carl Inskeep, for respondent.

WELLS

WELLS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WELLS, Judge: The instant case is a proceeding under section 6226 for a readjustment of partnership items of Pacific Securities (the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. E.A. Brannen and Frances K. Brannen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Brannen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Snell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  5. Stern Bros. & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API