Cavallaro v. Cavallaro
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SOMERVILLE, Judge.
An appeal was taken by the husband from a decree entered in a dissolution of marriage proceeding.
One point is posited by the husband on appeal: “The trial court erred in its entry of final judgment because the trial court failed to ascribe value to the marital property adjudged to each spouse.” This point is raised notwithstanding a record containing evidence, which it is assumed the trial court took into account, enabling it to determine the value of the marital property. Moreover, the husband makes no charge that the division of the marital property *421was unjust or that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fields v. FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wilhoit v. WilhoitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fastnacht v. FastnachtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hopkins v. HopkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Waitsman v. WaitsmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dardick v. DardickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- In Re Marriage of DusingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hayes v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984