Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Tower

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 9, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the chief justice.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the chief justice. The bill complains against the defendants and directors of the Concord Railroad, and alleges that they, in violation of law and of the charter and by-laws of the corporation, have loaned or deposited with certain corporations or individuals large sums of money which ought to have been paid to the treasurer, and, as the complainant believes, without any adequate security for the safe keeping of these deposits or loans, and prays that they may be restrained by injunction. To this bill there is a general demurrer, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Merrill v. PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belisle v. BelisleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Eastman v. ThayerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API