Legal Opinion

White and Newman v. Frank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1897No. 558PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from McCulloch County.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

A. B. Frank, one of the defendants in error, brought this suit against W. B. Dupree and others, who are also defendants in error in this court, to recover an undivided one-half inter est in four surveys of land granted to Valentine Hohmann as an immigrant under the colonization contract of Fisher and Miller. W. B. White and F. M. Newman, plaintiffs in error, intervened in the suit and claimed also an undivided one-half interest in the land. The defendants claiming separate parcels of the premises in controversy pleaded not guilty and set up a demand for compensation for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hitchler v. ScanlanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. NilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Garner v. BoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API