Legal Opinion

Crookshanks v. Ransbarger

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1917PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Fayette County. Suit by Elizabeth F. Croobshanks and others against Homer Ransbarger and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger, Judge:

The general issue raised by the pleadings in this cause is whether or not a certain contract for the sale of real estate is valid. The original and amended and supplemental bills attacked it upon two grounds, fraud in the procurement thereof and fatal uncertainty in the description of the subject matter. In response to these attacks and the prayer for cancellation, the defendants filed their answer and cross-bill praying specific performance. The decree appealed from granted, the relief prayed for in the bill, upon the theory of fraud in the procurement of the contract,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Dunham v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Reeves v. RossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Brown v. GatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Freudenberger Oil Co. v. SimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Ellison v. Evergreen CemeteryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Timberlake v. HeflinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Erwin v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Stone v. KaufmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API