Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Hampton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1905No. 20,293PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Benton Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Judge. Action by Joseph W. McConnell as administrator of the estate of Samuel K. Holin, deceased, and others against Charles E. Hampton as assessor of Benton county, and others, Erorn a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Bums 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the Court

Gillett, ,J.

The purpose of this action was to restrain the county assessor of Benton county from placing on the tax duplicate certain assessments as and for personal property omitted in past years by the decedent of said Joseph W. McConnell, administrator. It appears from the complaint that the county assessor .had initiated the proceeding by giving the proper notice of his intention to add assessments to the duplicate. The complaint alleges that the decedent in his lifetime reported and exhibited each year to the township assessor all his loans, credits, notes, mortgages, bonds, stocks,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Cheatham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Allen v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. KoehneSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Florer v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. County Board of Review of Grant CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Sluder v. Mahan, Treas., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Jordan v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cooper v. County Board of Review of Grant CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API