Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Abramson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 26, 2005, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive extended unemployment insurance benefits under the temporary extended unemployment compensation program for displaced airline-related workers.

Claimant, an-accountant, was placed by Staff Plus, Inc., a temporary employment agency, with Goldman Sachs, an investment brokerage firm. He was laid off in 2002 and thereafter began receiving unemployment insurance benefits. However, claimant’s subsequent application for extended benefits under the Temporary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Freelance Advantage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re Faculty Tutoring Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of AbramsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of WexlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API