Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Gall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the American Surety Company and another from an ' order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Kings, entered in • said Surrogate’s Court on the 26th day of July, 1899, as resettled ■by an order entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 3d day of November, 1899, opening á.'decree made upon a final settlement of the estate of Joseph Gall, deceased.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

When this matter was first before this court, it came up by way of an appeal from an order made by the surrogate of Kings county, which denied an application by the petitioner for leave to issue execution against the administratrix of the estate. This court affirmed the order of the surrogate in that proceeding, but held that, upon the facts as they appeared in the record, the petitioner was entitled to apply to open the decree of settlement and establish his rights therein as against the administratrix of the estate. (Matter of Gall, 40 App. Div. 114.) The matter was again before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deobold v. . OppermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. In re the Estate of GallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. In re the Estate of GallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of GallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. In re Gall's EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. In re Gall's EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API