Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Lee

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. 20130017Published

1ConcurrenceCrothers, Justice

[¶ 29] I agree with the Court’s ultimate disposition of this matter but write separately on a legal concern neither raised by the parties nor resolved by the majority.

[¶ 30] Our authority in lawyer disciplinary matters is broad:

“We generally prefer the full benefit of the adversarial process before deciding a matter. However, even without arguments and objections from the parties, we are obliged to correctly interpret and apply the law and ‘our duty is especially important in lawyer disciplinary cases where we adjudicate in the first instance rather than act as an appellate tribunal.’ ”

Discipl…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoover Slovacek LLP v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SaperoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KellingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cox v. BoggsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API