Legal Opinion

Fishman v. Fishman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 5, 1945No. Docket 148/470Published

1Opinion of the Court

I am advised that an appeal has been taken from this court's order directing the complainant to make fuller and more particular statement in her bill of complaint. Hence this memorandum.

Complainant's bill is brought against her former husband, Samuel S. Fishman, Jr., and against Fishman's, Inc., a corporation. The bill prays, amongst other things, that this court adjudicate that the corporate defendant has no rights, and can have no rights, against the complainant by virtue of certain restrictive covenants made by the complainant and below more particularly discussed. The bill also seeks a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fleckenstein Bros. v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  2. Palumbo v. PiccioniNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  3. Philip A. Singer Bro. v. A. Hollander SonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  4. Yanko v. GoldbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  5. Schrafft v. WoltersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API