Legal Opinion

Richards-Wilcox Manfg. Co. v. Talbot & Meier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 111, Calendar No. 35,258PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The defendant was the general contractor for the construction of a T. M. C. A. building in Detroit. The Paul O. Winkler Company was the subcontractor for the carpentry work. This latter company contracted with plaintiff for the purchase and installation of “Fold-R-Way Folding Partitions,” which contract plaintiff performed. Not having received the contract price, plaintiff threatened to place a lien upon the building. To prevent this, the defendant in writing guaranteed to plaintiff payment of the amount due it. The subcontractor became a bankrupt. Plaintiff brought this suit upon defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Haughton Elevator & Machine Co. v. Detroit Candy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Power Specialty Co. v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moline Furniture Works v. Club Holding Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Berk v. Gordon Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
  3. Milks v. TrittenMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API