Legal Opinion
O'NEILL v. Steppat
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1978No. 12177PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPorter, Justice
(on reassignment).
CASE SUMMARY
This appeal presents a question dealing with the interrelationship between various Articles of the Uniform Commercial Code. The trial court concluded that the UCC Article 2 four-year statute of limitations applies to an action to collect on a promissory note given in part payment of a contract for sale. The court granted defendant buyers’ motion for summary judgment. We reverse.
FACTS
On August 31, 1970, sellers and buyers entered into a purchase agreement concerning the sale of a business in Gregory, along with certain personal property. The pur chase price for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosemary Foster v. Colorado Radio Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Melms v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. CopleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Meister v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Jones v. BaileyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Lenape Resources Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Gray v. Suttell & AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2015
- Fallimento C.OP.M.A. v. Fischer Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Alpacas of America, LLC v. GroomeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- EZ Cash 1, LLC v. Brigance (In Re Brigance)District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.