City of Philadelphia v. River Front Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 380, Jan. T., 1896, by The River Front Railroad Company, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Pliila. Co., March T., 1886, No. 818, on bill in equity. Bill in equity to restrain the construction of a railroad.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 380, Jan. T., 1896, by The River Front Railroad Company, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Pliila. Co., March T., 1886, No. 818, on bill in equity. Bill in equity to restrain the construction of a railroad. The case was referred to Charles E. Morgan, Jr., Esq., master, who reported as follows : This controversy, for all practical purposes, is between the plaintiff and the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company, defendant, on one side, and The River Front Railroad Company on the other, both the plaintiff and the first named defendant contending that the railroad, which is the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
There was no error in making the decrees referred to in the first specification, nor in dismissing the exceptions to the master’s report recited in the third specification. The questions involved in the assignments of error, so far as they are material, have been so fully considered by the learned master that we deem it unnecessary to add anything to what he has said.
The decree is affirmed on his report, and the appeal is dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendant.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Curry v. Harmony Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916