Legal Opinion

Shaland v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 5, 1951No. 7926; Entry Nos. 707690; 723604; 815734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for a reappraisement, brought by the importer, involves shipments of novelty porcelainware from Japan during the year 1940. The shipments, were made from Nagoya, but the goods were manufactured in Seto, a town about 40 miles inland. The issue raised is whether or not the freight from Seto to Nagoya was a part of the value. An inspection of the invoices discloses that there are various kinds of merchandise covered thereby other than porcelain-ware. All charges for inland freight from the place of manufacture, including Seto to Nagoya, were deducted but the deduction…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ShalandUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Miller ex rel. Eagle Technical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API