Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pridgett

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 6, 2018No. 17–P–963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was arrested when he was sitting in the passenger seat of a stolen car. He was charged with receiving a stolen motor vehicle, subsequent offense, and receiving stolen property over $250 with respect to certain items found in the car. The defendant filed a motion to suppress the statements he made to a police officer after the arrest. That motion was allowed by a Boston Municipal Court judge. On the Commonwealth's interlocutory appeal, we affirm.

Background. The following facts were elicited at a hearing on the motion to suppress.2 On September 9, 2016, a police officer was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. StoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. Va Meng JoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. DamianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. PridgettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API