Legal Opinion

Austin Congress Corp. v. Mannina

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1964No. Gen. 49,391Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

46 Ill. App.2d 192 (1964)

196 N.E.2d 33

Austin Congress Corporation, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Anthony Mannina, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Gen. No. 49,391.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District, Second Division.

January 14, 1964.

Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, and William T. Kirby, all of Chicago (Thomas M. Thomas and Frederick W. Temple, of counsel), for appellants.

David, Fainman, Abrahams & Chapman, and Devoe, Shadur, Mikva & Plotkin, all of Chicago (Dan R. Roin, Milton I. Shadur, Robert Plotkin and William Shlensky, of counsel), for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · BryantJustice Bryant

This is an…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API