Legal Opinion

People v. McNair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant’s belated protestations of innocence, unsubstantiated claims of mental incapacity and groundless allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel are insufficient to warrant a hearing on the motion (see, People v Barnett, 136 AD2d 555, lv denied 71 NY2d 966; People v Irizzary, 125 AD2d 589, lv denied 69 NY2d 829). Moreover, because defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to set forth the grounds for his withdrawal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. TinsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. IrizzaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. McNairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API