Legal Opinion
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Reilly
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided January 13, 2006No. 05-1365PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
This matter is before us on a review of the findings and recommendation of the Grievance Commission concerning alleged ethical violations by respondent, attorney Michael G. Reilly. The review is undertaken pursuant to the provisions of Iowa Court Rule 35.10. The commission found that respondent was guilty of a conversion of clients’ funds and had perpetrated a check-kiting scheme that caused a substantial loss to one of the banks involved in the transaction. The Grievance Commission recommended that Reilly be suspended from practice for a period of three years. After reviewing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. OttesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HanselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Rodney Howard PowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Aaron J. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Michael CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Brandon AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Donald N. Laing and D. Scott RailsbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.