Legal Opinion

Messineo v. City of Amsterdam

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1966PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, ' Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Keating. Chief Judge Desmond and Judge Keating concur in the following memorandum: Affirmance here seems compelled under the rule of non-*525liability most recently applied by this court in Motyka v. City of Amsterdam (15 N Y 2d 134) and Henry v. City of New York (15 N Y 2d 726) and which rule the court now declines to change. However, we again call attention, as in the dissent in Motyka (supra, p. 140), to the injustice of the rule and its incongruity under modern conditions.…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. O'Connor v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Campbell v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dufrene v. GuarinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Tompkins v. Kenner Police Dept.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API