Legal Opinion

Laposta v. Himmer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1947No. Appeal, 177PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■Pee Curiam,

All of the alleged errors covered by the appellants’ assignments on this appeal were painstakingly considered and correctly disposed of by the learned court en banc. As nothing is to be gained by Our reiterating either the facts or the law, the judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kennedy for the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Hladyshewski v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Ridgway National Bank, Guardian of the Estate of Robert Aiello, a Mental Incompetent v. North American Van Lines, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Carey v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Eastern Contractors, Inc. v. ZinkandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API