Legal Opinion

United States v. Aparo

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 17, 2002No. 1:01-cr-00416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge.

Nine defendants of the forty who were originally indicted have moved this Court for an order which, if issued, would grant each the specific relief they seek. Some of those motions can readily be addressed.

Bench Trial

The defendant, Grossman, has moved to be tried by the Court without a jury. Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that a defendant may waive a jury trial in writing with the approval of the Court and the consent of the government. The government has refused consent and his motion must, therefore, be denied.

Audibi…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BarretDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. United States v. StegemannDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
  3. United States v. MohamedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API