Legal Opinion

Denby v. Echo Falls Farm, Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided August 14, 1959No. 1533Published

1Opinion of the Court

Satterthwaite, J.,

— The narrow question presently raised in this assumpsit action is the determination of the effective date of substituted service of a complaint within the meaning of Pa. R. C. P. 1026 which allows 20 days thereafter within which to file a defense.The problem arises on defendant’s application to strike off a default judgment for want of an answer, on the ground that the entry thereof was premature and hence unauthorized.

Defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation. Upon filing the complaint, plaintiff applied to the court for leave to make service thereof under Pa. R. C. P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Downes v. HODINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Heaney v. Mauch Chunk Boro. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Wax v. Van MarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Ehrenzeller v. ChubbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API