Denby v. Echo Falls Farm, Inc.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County
1Opinion of the Court
Satterthwaite, J.,
— The narrow question presently raised in this assumpsit action is the determination of the effective date of substituted service of a complaint within the meaning of Pa. R. C. P. 1026 which allows 20 days thereafter within which to file a defense.The problem arises on defendant’s application to strike off a default judgment for want of an answer, on the ground that the entry thereof was premature and hence unauthorized.
Defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation. Upon filing the complaint, plaintiff applied to the court for leave to make service thereof under Pa. R. C. P.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Downes v. HODINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Heaney v. Mauch Chunk Boro. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Wax v. Van MarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Ehrenzeller v. ChubbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.