Legal Opinion
In Re Lead Paint Litigation
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 15, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
924 A.2d 484 (2007)
191 N.J. 405
In re LEAD PAINT LITIGATION.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 28, 2006.
Decided June 15, 2007.
Ezra D. Rosenberg, Princeton, argued the cause for appellants, American Cyanamid Co.; Atlantic Richfield Company; Cytec Industries, Inc.; E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company, ConAgra Grocery Products Company; Millenium Inorganic Chemicals Inc.; NL Industries, Inc. and Sherwin-Williams Co. (Dechert, attorneys for Atlantic Richfield Company; Coughlin Duffy, attorneys for American Cyanamid Co. and Cytec Industries, Inc.; Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hoens; Dissent.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- In Re Lead Paint LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Fox v. SnowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.