Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rumbaugh v. Procunier

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1985No. 83-1161Published

1DissentGoldberg, Circuit Judge

A majority of this panel has concluded that Charles Rumbaugh is competent to waive whatever rights stand between him and state-imposed death. Despite the existence of substantial questions regarding the constitutionality of his sentence, we are told that no one will be allowed to press these issues on his behalf because the district court’s pronouncement of competency was not clearly erroneous. We are told not only that we cannot scrutinize the validity of an admittedly hair’s-breadth call by a single judge but also that this man is not necessarily competent — he has merely not been proved…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API