Legal Opinion

Matlock

United States Tax Court

Decided June 8, 1992No. Docket No. 2285-90Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT MATLOCK, A.K.A. R.D. MATLOCK AND LYDIA MATLOCK, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Matlock

Docket No. 2285-90

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-324; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 349; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 3108;

June 8, 1992, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Robert Matlock, pro se.

Mark E. Menacker, for respondent.

BEGHE

BEGHE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

BEGHE, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in and additions to petitioners' Federal income tax as follows:

Additions to Tax

Sec.

Sec.

Sec.

Sec.

Year

Deficiency

6651

6653(a)(1)

6653(a)(2)

6661

1984

$ 7,192

--

$ 360

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  4. Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Bixby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API