Legal Opinion
Strauss v. Arthur Wolfsohn Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, dismissing complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
The action is to recover damages for wrongful discharge. The complaint alleges that on or about December 22, 1913, the defendant hired plaintiff as a salesman for one year from December 8, 1913, on a *172commission basis; that by said contract defendant agreed to pay plaintiff fifty-five dollars a week during the life of the agreement, to be charged against the commission earned by the plaintiff; and that on or about May 29, 1914, plaintiff was without cause discharged from the employment.
In view of the admission of plaintiff’s counsel that the letter written by defendant to plaintiff, and “…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milage v. . WoodwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Louis Auerbach, Inc. v. RamerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
- Durante v. RaimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Miller v. Blaisdell Machinery Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
- Samuels v. BloomAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Educational Films Corp. v. International Film Service Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927