Legal Opinion

Gildea v. Hill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Falligant. Chatham superior court. May 8, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

1. Where a jury in a justice’s court return a verdict for the defendant, it is not error for the judge of the superior court to grant a new trial upon certiorari, when the answer of the justice discloses that the jury in the justice’s court improperly carried to their room a written document which was not introduced in evidence and which, if read hy the jury, was calculated to injure the plaintiff.

2. At the hearing of a certiorari in the superior court, nothing can he considered hy the judge hut the petition and answer. It follows that it was not error for the judge to refuse to consider…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Landrum v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Tyner v. LeakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Willis v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Lears v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Sapp v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API